Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Strome

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 25, 1940No. 14,809PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiffs in error are hereinafter referred to as the Commission, the Fund, and the Company, respectively, and defendant in error as Strome.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. Strome made claim for an injury inflicted by another employee of the company. The defense was that the injury did not arise out of the employment. The referee found for Strome but the Commission entered an award against him. The court reversed that award and ordered compensation. To review that judgment this writ is prosecuted.

While discharging his duty as an employee of the Company, Strome, in a stooping position…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. KruzicSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kandt v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Perez v. Fred Harvey, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. In Re Quest. Sub. by US Ct. of AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. Alpine Roofing Company v. DaltonColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Kirk v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API