Legal Opinion

Perez v. Fred Harvey, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1950No. 5264PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Appellant, Clarinda Perez, while employed by appellee, Fred Harvey, ínc., as á housemaid in the employer’s hotel at Albuquerque, New Mexico, was shot and seriously injured by Rumaldo Padilla, a fellow servant. The cause was tried to a jury and at the close of the case the trial court sustained appellees’ motion for a directed verdict and entered judgment dismissing the complaint. The question for decision is whether this action of the trial court was error. • ■

There was evidence of the facts to follow before the jury.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Pekin Cooperage Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Harden v. Thomasville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Withers v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Brookhaven Steam Laundry v. WattsMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Genuine Parts Co. v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Cedar Rapids Community School v. CadySupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. Chandler v. BattenfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Candelaria v. General Electric Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API