Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. Kruzic
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Mk. Justice Holland
delivered the opinion of the court.
The employer plaintiff will be referred to as the company and defendants in error as claimant and the commission.
It is not disputed that claimant was employed by the company at the time of the injury. The only evidence before the commission concerning the injury was that of Kruzic, the claimant. His testimony furnishes a sufficient statement of the facts, and in substance is as follows:
“That on June 6,1933, while working at a timber camp (conceded to be operated by respondent employer) one John Senko shot him in the chest, the bullet…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. Pueblo Auto Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- McKnight v. HouckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
3Cited by14 opinions
- Leroy Stewart v. United States of America, Gary D. Nuss, and Rockwell International Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Quest. Sub. by US Ct. of AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Mayo v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Ortiz Pérez v. Fondo del Seguro del EstadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. McCoySupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.