Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc. v. Sparks
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order imposing sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 128.5.
I. Background Facts
The parties to this appeal are plaintiff and cross-defendant Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc. (appellant), and defendants and cross-complainants Adam Sparks and Pacific Bay Inn, Inc. (respondents). In July 1990 appellant filed a complaint alleging that respondents operated a tourist hotel at Pacific Bay Inn in violation of city laws. The case was consolidated with a prior action filed by the City of San Francisco alleging the same…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Long Beach v. BozekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Kirsch v. DuryeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- 580 Folsom Associates v. Prometheus Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Ellis v. Roshei Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. WPS, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Smith v. Selma Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Perez v. GrajalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Kane v. HurleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Argaman v. RatanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.