Legal Opinion

Kane v. Hurley

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1994No. B080362PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIGNON, J.

Appellant, Attorney Jonathan B. Cole, appeals from an order requiring him to pay sanctions to the trial court for bad faith actions, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5. Although appellant raises a number of contentions on appeal, we need resolve only one. We conclude section 128.5 sanctions may not be ordered payable to the trial court. We reverse.

Facts and Procedural Background

Attorney William C. Melcher represented the plaintiff in an action against defendants represented by Attorney Jack R. Willis. In the course of the proceedings, the trial court imposed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Moyal v. LanphearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. People v. TabbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. People v. Perez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. AB CELLULAR LA, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. Carlos E.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Person v. A.V.California Court of Appeal · 2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API