Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. WPS, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1999No. B112133PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.

Introduction

Adam J. Telanoff, counsel for WPS, Inc., received copies of State Compensation Insurance Fund’s (State Fund) internal documents containing privileged attorney-client communications because State Fund’s outside lawyers inadvertently sent them along with other documents produced for use at trial. Adam Telanoff gave some of the privileged documents to an expert witness he consulted for the WPS matter. The expert witness then provided those documents to another lawyer who was adverse to and pursuing a different claim against State Fund. When State Fund’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. General Dynamics Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Platt Pacific, Inc. v. AndelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. Cobra Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Oaks Management Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2000
  5. McDermott Will & Emery LLP v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API