Legal Opinion
Bricklin v. Stengol Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 3, 1984No. (2256)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
This is a combined appeal 1 from the judgments of the trial court in four cases which involve requests for the dissolution of a corporation, for the winding up and dissolution of a limited partnership and for the discharge of two notices of lis pendens. The briefs of the parties being silent on the matter of the judgments in the third and fourth cases which discharged the notices of lis pendens, we find no error in those two cases. The plaintiffs in the first and second cases are Benjamin Brieklin and Rebecca Golub. The remaining parties are defendants in one or both of the first two cases.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Burnet v. LeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Matthews v. FMC CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Katz Corp. v. T. H. Canty & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ostrowski v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. HollowayConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Balsamides v. PerleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Lawson Mardon Wheaton, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Bishins v. MateerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.