Legal Opinion

Katz Corp. v. T. H. Canty & Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 25, 1975PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.

This stockholder’s derivative action was brought on behalf of the defendant T. H. Canty and Company, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, by the Katz Corporation, a Delaware corporation and minority stockholder of the defendant corporation. The plaintiff sought relief against the defendants Michael Steinberg, John Keogh, Jr., and Frank N. Robinson, all officers and directors of the defendant corporation, alleging that they had breached their fiduciary duty to the corporation by usurping a corporate opportunity and benefiting personally thereby. The trial court found the issues for the defendants…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  3. Diamond v. OreamunoNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Brophy v. Cities Service Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
  5. Osborne v. Locke Steel Chain Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Pacelli Bros. Transportation, Inc. v. PacelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Science Accessories Corp. v. Summagraphics Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  4. In Re ORFA Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
  5. Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API