Legal Opinion

Matthews v. FMC Corporation

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 26, 1983No. 10159PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

In this suit seeking damages for personal injuries received from a product claimed to be defective the jury found the issues for the defendant manufacturer. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment rendered in accordance with the verdict and contends: (1) that the charge to the jury unwarrantedly confined the basis for imposing liability on the defendant to the malfunctioning of the machine; and (2) that the evidence was insufficient for submission to the jury of the special defense of misuse of the product by the plaintiff. We find the first claim to be without merit. That disposition of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Siladi v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. State v. CobbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Buckman v. People Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API