Legal Opinion

Burnet v. Leininger

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 14, 1932No. 426PublishedCited by 346 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

delivered; the opinion of the Court.

The respondent sought a redetermination of deficiencies in income taxes for the years 1920 to 1923. The question related to the income earned on respondent’s share in a partnership known as the Eagle Laundry Company, doing business in Cleveland, Ohio. By virtue of an agreement made with his wife, respondent insisted that she was ‘ a full equal partner with him in his interest in the partnership ’, and that each-, should return and pay tax upon one-half of the income attributable to that interest. The Commissioner determined that respondent was taxable upon…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Hoeper v. Tax Comm'n of Wis.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by346 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Harrison v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

341 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API