Legal Opinion
Bishins v. Mateer
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided June 30, 2004No. 02-P-1399PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcHugh, J.
Multistate commercial and marital entanglements produced a controversy over entitlement to shares of a Massachusetts limited partnership and. an interest in the real estate the limited partnership owns. A judge of the Superior Court allowed a motion for summary judgment in favor of Richard B. *424Mateer, P. A. (Mateer), a Florida claimant who contends that he owns both the shares and the real estate. The limited partnership and Bishins, one of its general and limited partners, appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
We describe the undisputed facts only with detail sufficient to understand…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sutton v. LeibSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Wright MacHine Corp. v. Seaman-Andwall Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- First Wis. Nat. Bank of Milwaukee v. DonianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Bennett v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Cavanagh v. CavanaghMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lamarche v. LussierMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- University of Pennsylvania v. HalpernMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
- Harvard 45 Associates, LLC v. Allied Properties & Mortgages, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Reichenbach v. Financial Freedom Centers, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
- Genentech, Inc. v. Arendal Mgmt., Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.