Legal Opinion

State v. Lark

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 1992No. C89-12-37103; CA A67396PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

After a trial to the court on stipulated facts, defendant was convicted of burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. The indictment alleged that the offense “occurred in an occupied dwelling.” Defendant stipulated that he and an accomplice had burglarized an occupied dwelling, but that he did not personally enter the dwelling. On appeal he challenges the classification of his conviction on the Crime Seriousness Scale under the sentencing guidelines. He argues that it was error to rank his conviction in category 8, instead of category 7, because that imposed an enhanced sentence on the basis…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Merrill v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State v. BlackerOregon Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LarkOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. FlaniganOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. FlaniganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. CovenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API