Legal Opinion
State v. Perez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 21, 1993No. 91-02100CR, 91-01159CR and 91-02067CR CA A72295 (Control), CA A72349 and CA A72350 (Cases Consolidated)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance (DCS) and possession of a controlled substance (PCS). ORS 475.992. He demurred to the indictment on the ground that the offenses charged in the indictment were barred by the ex post facto provisions of the Oregon and federal constitutions. The court overruled the demurrer, and defendant appeals. We affirm.
The offenses were committed on January 9, 1991. Defendant was originally indicted under the “scheme or network” offense subcategory language of the sentencing guidelines. OAR 253-04-002(3), Appendix 4. On February 6, 1991, we held…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. GallantOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Dawson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. JaehnigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. Bojorques-QuinonezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.