Legal Opinion

State v. Flanigan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1993No. CC CM90-0797; CA A68280; SC S39618PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

The issue in this criminal case is the application of the offense subcategories of Burglary I provided in the Oregon sentencing guidelines, OAR chapter 253, division 4.

Defendant was charged with burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, 1 and robbery in the second degree, ORS 164.405. The accusatory instrument alleged that, during the commission of the burglary, “defendant caused or threatened physical injury to the * * * victim.”

A jury convicted defendant of burglary but acquitted him of robbery. In its verdict, the jury made a special finding that defendant personally did not cause or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LarkOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. FlaniganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. LarkOregon Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API