Legal Opinion
Breneman v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 6, 2003No. 02-1854 LPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject *572matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs seek compensation for defendant’s physical taking and imposition of a servitude upon plaintiffs’ property through the publication of an aeronautical chart and the issuance of two hazard determinations by the United States acting through the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA or defendant), an administration within the Department of Transportation. See Complaint (Compl.) H 41; 49 U.S.C. § 106(a)…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Breneman v. United States Ex Rel. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Passamaquoddy Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Nez Perce Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Ak-Chin Indian Community v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Kaw Nation of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.