Legal Opinion
Handeland v. Department of Real Estate
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1976No. Civ. 47219PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of administrative mandamus. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.)
On May 17, 1974, pursuant to Government Code section 11503, an accusation was filed by the Department of Real Estate (Department) charging that petitioner had knowingly created a subdivision within the meaning of the Business and Professions Code section 11000, 1 but failed to notify the Commissioner of the Department in writing of his intention to sell such subdivided land prior to the time it was sold in violation of section 11010, and that petitioner…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Houge v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- City of Los Angeles v. Rancho Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Bachenheimer v. Palm Springs Management Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Askew v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- California Coastal Commission v. Quanta Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Los Angeles County-U.S.C. Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Stickel v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Norman v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Andrepont v. MeekerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.