Legal Opinion

Houge v. Ford

California Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1955No. L. A. 23250PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Defendant Ford, an attorney, appeals from an adverse judgment in a declaratory relief action brought by plaintiff, his former client, for the purpose of settling con troverted claims relative to a contingent fee contract, which was followed by an assignment. The trial court construed the original contract in line with plaintiff’s contention that defendant had failed to complete the agreed legal services; and upon that basis, it concluded that the contract and the assignment were of no further force and effect. Defendant maintains that the court erred in its construction of the parties’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Barker Bros., Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Arnold v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Heidlebaugh v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Dalzell v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Central Valley General Hospital v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Nieto v. Blue Shield of California Life & Health InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. State v. FyfeAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Leo F. Piazza Paving Co. v. Foundation Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API