Legal Opinion

Bachenheimer v. Palm Springs Management Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1953No. Civ. 19289PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATROSSO, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff instituted this action to rescind certain agreements executed between herself and the defendants which are hereinafter described and to recover all monies paid by her thereunder. Her complaint sought relief upon three grounds: (1) that the execution of the agreements in question was procured by the fraud of the defendants; (2) that the agreements constitute “securities” within the meaning of the Corporate Securities Act and hence are void because the sale and issuance thereof was not authorized by a permit of the Commissioner of Corporations, and (3) that they…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Howard v. ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. McMillan v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  4. Sherman v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Barnett v. LincolnWashington Supreme Court · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Moreggia & Sons, Inc. City of San Francisco Market Corporation v. Edward M. Walsh, Trustee American Poultry Company, CreditorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. In the Matter of Wonderfair Stores, Inc. Of Arizona, Debtor. Sam Jonas, Trustee-Appellant v. Walgreen Arizona Drug Co., Walgreen Arizona Drug Co. v. Mary Ann LevittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Parker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. E. Gottschalk & Co. v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Boesel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API