Legal Opinion
Grass Valley Terrace v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 2, 2002No. 98-726CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant seeks the dismissal of Plaintiffs’ post-1979 contract claims because the Court previously held that Plaintiffs’ contracts at issue do not contain an unmistakable promise by the Government to immunize Plaintiffs from subsequent legislation. Grass Valley Terrace v. United States, 46 Fed.Cl. 629, 640 (2000) (“Grass Valley I ”). Additionally, the Defendant seeks dismissal of all Plaintiffs’ takings claims, i.e. both pre-1979 takings claims and posb-1979 takings claims. In opposition, Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Yankee Atomic Electric Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- General Dynamics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Centex Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Allegre Villa, Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.