Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Cariss

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1990No. D009525PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, Acting P. J.

Defendant Al Cariss, an insurance agent for the Farmers Group of Companies, successfully demurred to plaintiff Glenn Duane Saunders’s fourth amended complaint seeking damages for fraud and emotional distress. Saunders appeals the judgment of dismissal contending his complaint alleges a valid cause of action. We agree and accordingly reverse with instructions.

Factual and Procedural Background

In 1986, Saunders bought a Farmers automobile policy through Cariss. The police provided for uninsured motorist coverage with $100,000 limits. That policy was in effect on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Karam v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Williams v. Beechnut Nutrition Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Moe v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Walker v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. McAlvain v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. McBride v. BoughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Good v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
  4. North American Chemical Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Kim v. Westmoore Partners, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API