Legal Opinion

McBride v. Boughton

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 2004No. A103456PublishedCited by 173 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, J.

This case calls upon us to decide, as a matter of first impression in this state, whether an unmarried man who has expended funds to support a child, in reliance on the mother’s representation that he is the child’s father, may sue the mother on an unjust enrichment theory for the return of the funds after discovering that the child is not his biological offspring. As a matter of public policy, we conclude that such a suit cannot be maintained. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment dismissing this case after sustaining the defendants’ demurrer.

I

Facts and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lectrodryer v. SeoulBankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Melchior v. New Line Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ZerinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by173 opinions

  1. Durell v. Sharp HealthcareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Perrin Davis v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Berryman v. Merit Property Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Rutherford Holdings, LLC v. Plaza Del ReyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. K.C. Multimedia, Inc. v. Bank of America Technology & Operations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API