Lindley v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
REAVIS, Justice.
By one issue, appellant Kevin Dee Lind-ley argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss an indictment against him with prejudice because the State failed to bring him to trial on the charges contained in the indictment within the time allotted by Article 111(a) of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA), and that dismissal was therefore required under Article V(c). Based upon the rationale expressed herein, we affirm.
On November 5, 1993, appellant was indicted by a Lubbock County grand jury for the offenses of burglary of a habitation and unauthorized…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. David Henson, A/K/A Paul v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- David Andrew Birdwell v. Jack Skeen, Jr., Criminal District Attorney of Smith County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
- State v. Earl Scott Chesnut, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
- Dominique Dontae Lasker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
- State v. Votta, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- Arthur Alexander Office v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.