Legal Opinion

State v. Votta

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 21, 2008No. 13-07-00634-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice VALDEZ.

The State appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing the charges against appellee, Joseph Votta, a/k/a Joseph Vital, based on his not having been brought to trial within the limitation period specified in Article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA). See Tex.Code CRIM. PROC. Ann. art. 51.14 (Vernon 2006). The State asserts five issues on appeal. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In October 1996, the Jackson County District Attorney’s Office indicted appellee on charges of possession of cocaine 1 and possession of heroin. 2 See Tex. Health…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. CullenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Alabama v. BozemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. VottaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Ex Parte James Harnage, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
  3. Ex Parte James Harnage, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
  4. State v. Votta, Joseph A/K/A Joseph VitalCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  5. State v. Votta, Joseph A/K/A Joseph VitalCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API