Legal Opinion
United States v. Mauro
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 23, 1978No. 76-1596PublishedCited by 699 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
In 1970 Congress enacted the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, 18 U. S. C. App., pp. 1395-1398 (1976 ed.), joining the United States and the District of Columbia as parties to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (Agreement) ,1 The Agreement, which has also been enacted by 46 States, is designed “to encourage the expeditious and orderly disposition of . . . charges [outstanding against a prisoner] and determination of the proper status of any and all detainers based on untried indictments, informations, or complaints.” Art. I. It prescribes procedures by which a member State may obtain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
- Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Richard T. FordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Claude John Scallion, Raymond Lynn Buckelew, James Laney Jenkins and Judson Lee DraneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by699 opinions
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Johnny Dickerson v. State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
694 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.