Legal Opinion
State v. Earl Scott Chesnut
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided February 12, 2014No. 06-13-00107-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice MORRISS.
Earl Scott Chesnut was in a federal prison in Oregon when he was, first, indicted 1 in Hopkins County, Texas, for theft of a firearm and, then, made the subject of a Texas-issued detainer served on officials in Oregon. In response, Chesnut applied for the final disposition of the Hopkins County indictment pursuant to the terms of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA), which both Texas and Oregon have adopted. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 51.14 (West 2006). When Ches-nut was not brought to trial by the State of Texas within 180 days, as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alabama v. BozemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Nieto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Richard W. Norton v. Al C. ParkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Donald F. Huff v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
- Dominique Dontae Lasker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
- Huff, DonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Ricky Lynn Williams v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice And Debra Gibbs, Assistant Director, Classification and Records, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2021
- Vikram S. Chauhan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.