Legal Opinion

United States v. David Henson, A/K/A Paul v. Andrews

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 25, 1991No. 90-1880PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYR, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Paul V. Andrews, a/k/a David Henson (hereinafter “Henson”), was convicted of robbing three federally insured institutions in the Boston area by “force and violence or by intimidation,” in viola tion of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Henson contends on appeal that all three convictions must be set aside due to insufficient evidence, erroneous jury instructions, and violations of the Interstate Agreement on De-tainers Act (“IAD”), the Speedy Trial Act, and the fifth and sixth amendment speedy trial guarantees.

I

BACKGROUND

On August 6,1988, Henson, without permission, left the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Rashad v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  3. United States v. Santiago-BecerrilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. CasasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. DowdellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API