Legal Opinion
Riverside Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of Riverside
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 18, 2009No. E045792PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GAUT, J.
This action arises from the County of Riverside’s terminating Leisha Fauth’s employment as a senior district attorney investigator and thereafter refusing to engage in appeal proceedings provided under a memorandum of understanding (MOU) covering Fauth’s employment. The County of Riverside and its board of supervisors, district attorney, and executive officer (collectively, the county) appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court granted the first cause of action of Fauth’s petition for a writ of mandamus, seeking an MOU appeal hearing.
Plaintiffs Fauth and the Riverside…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Environmental Charter High School v. Centinela Valley Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wind Dancer Production Group v. Walt Disney PicturesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Riverside Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Ass'n of Orange County Deputy Sheriffs v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Martinez v. Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Martinez v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.