Legal Opinion
Environmental Charter High School v. Centinela Valley Union High School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 10, 2004No. B171813PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHMANN-GERST, J.
The trial court directed appellant Centinela Valley Union High School District (Centinela) to make school facilities available to respondent Environmental Charter High School (Environmental) pursuant to Education Code section 47614. Centinela appeals on the grounds that Environmental did not provide documentation for its facilities request and was not entitled to writ relief.
We reverse.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Environmental operates as a charter school. Originally, it sought sponsorship as a charter school by Centinela but Centinela refused. Thereafter,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- California Hotel & Motel Ass'n v. Industrial Welfare CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Cucamongans United for Reasonale Expansion v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- American Civil Liberties Union v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Simi Corporation v. GaramendiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Baeza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- O.W.L. Foundation v. City of Rohnert ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Harris v. StampolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Acosta v. SI CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Catholic Mutual Relief Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.