Legal Opinion

Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2003No. S098895PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

The Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) prohibits employment discrimination based on a physical disability. (Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a); 1 see Esberg v. Union Oil, Co. (2002) 28 Cal.4th 262, 267 [121 Cal.Rptr.2d 203, 47 P.3d 1069].) In 1997, defendant Braemar Country Club (Braemar) terminated plaintiff Francisco Colmenares, who had been in its employ for 25 years. Colmenares sued, alleging in part discrimination based on physical disability (a bad back), in violation of the FEHA. (§ 12900 et seq.) In May 2000, the trial court granted Braemar’s motion for summary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Green v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. SalasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Copley Press, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API