Wind Dancer Production Group v. Walt Disney Pictures
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZELON, J.
Plaintiffs and appellants are writers and producers who entered into a profit participation agreement with defendant and respondent Walt Disney Pictures regarding their work on the television series, Home Improvement. The parties’ agreement includes an “incontestability” clause, which requires a participant to object in specific detail to Disney’s quarterly participation statements within 24 months after the date sent, and to initiate a legal action within six months after the expiration of that 24-month period. In July 2008, following an audit of Disney’s books of account,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Media Rights Technologies, Inc v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Deerpoint Grp., Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- (PS) DeMartini v. DeMartiniDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Aiello v. Rent Recovery Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Barto/Signal Petroleum, Inc. v. Boneyard, LLC CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.