Legal Opinion

Wind Dancer Production Group v. Walt Disney Pictures

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 2017No. B262426PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZELON, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants are writers and producers who entered into a profit participation agreement with defendant and respondent Walt Disney Pictures regarding their work on the television series, Home Improvement. The parties’ agreement includes an “incontestability” clause, which requires a participant to object in specific detail to Disney’s quarterly participation statements within 24 months after the date sent, and to initiate a legal action within six months after the expiration of that 24-month period. In July 2008, following an audit of Disney’s books of account,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Media Rights Technologies, Inc v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Deerpoint Grp., Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  3. (PS) DeMartini v. DeMartiniDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Aiello v. Rent Recovery Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. Barto/Signal Petroleum, Inc. v. Boneyard, LLC CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API