Martinez v. Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtRichman, J.
*1161Government Code1 section 21156, part of the Public Employees Retirement Law, has always equated disability with a state employee being "incapacitated physically or mentally for the performance of his or her duties." And ordinarily, a governmental employee loses the right to claim disability benefits if terminated for cause. A pair of decisions from the Third Appellate District carved out three exceptions to this general rule. First, under Haywood v. American River Protection Dist . (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1292, 79 Cal.Rptr.2d 749 ( Haywood ), a terminated-for-cause employee can still qualify…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Nolan v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Mendoza v. Nordstrom, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Wolfe v. Dublin Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gamerberg v. 3000 E. 11th Street, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Monroe v. Cal. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026