Legal Opinion

Melfi v. City of Danbury

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 18, 1995No. 13623PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants in this action seeking damages for alleged obstruction of a public highway, creation and maintenance of a nuisance, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, as well as injunctive relief against future obstruction of the highway. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly (1) found that the plaintiffs’ evidence was not credible to establish that they were entitled to an award of money damages, and (2) refused to award damages. Because we dismiss the appeal, sua sponte, we do not reach these…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. State v. PowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Schick v. Windsor Airmotive Division/Barnes GroupConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. Smith v. Otis Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Melfi v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Matey v. Estate of DemberConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API