Legal Opinion

Wolden v. Gardner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1930No. 22664. Department TwoPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

— The facts giving rise to this litigation are, briefly stated, as follows: Defendant George Gardner, driving an automobile owned by his mother, the defendant C. Ann Gardner, together with three of his friends, including the cross-complainant Otto Wold, were, on the night of June 11, 1929, returning to their homes in Stanwood from a short trip to Blaine and points just across the British Columbia line, where they had passed a short hour in convivial association. As the party, on their return, were approaching the northern limits of the city of Mount Vernon, their car collided with another…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Saxe v. TerryWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Heiman v. KloiznerWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Wayson v. Rainier Taxi Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Adair v. NewkirkWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Garrow v. Seattle Taxicab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Eubanks v. KielsmeierWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Wise v. StaggMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Taylor v. TaugWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. United States v. Charlie Top SkyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Petrone v. MargolisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API