Legal Opinion

Adair v. Newkirk

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1928No. 21241. Department OnePublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

The defendants have appealed from an adverse judgment in the sum of $3,000, awarded by the trial court as damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff in an automobile accident.

No formal assignments of error are made, but from appellants’ brief and argument it clearly appears that reversal is sought on two grounds.

First, it is contended that respondent was not a guest or invitee in appellants’ car at the time of the accident; and second, that the appellant husband, the driver of the car, was not guilty of gross negligence such as would create a liability under the rule of Heiman v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saxe v. TerryWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Heiman v. KloiznerWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Klopfenstein v. EadsWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nist v. TudorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Kastel v. StieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Eubanks v. KielsmeierWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Rauch v. SteckleinOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Sorrell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API