Legal Opinion

Petrone v. Margolis

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 17, 1952PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

20 N.J. Super. 180 (1952)

89 A.2d 476

LIZETTA PETRONE, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF ALBERT PETRONE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

RONALD MARGOLIS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 2, 1952.

Decided June 17, 1952.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and GOLDMANN.

Mr. William Furst argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Manuel L. Barrett, on the brief).

Mr. Arthur J. Blake argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Markley & Broadhurst, attorneys; Mr. Edward A. Markley, of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. McNair v. BergerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Milstrey v. City of HackensackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  4. Wise v. StaggMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. O'Connell v. McKeownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. DortaSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Jacobsen Construction Co. v. Structo-Lite Engineering, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Tabor v. O'GRADYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Paddock v. SchuelkeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Fordham v. OldroydUtah Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API