Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taug

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1943No. 28837PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, C. J.

Dorothy Taylor, a minor, instituted this action through her guardian ad litem, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained while riding as a guest in an automobile owned and operated by defendant. At the close of plaintiff’s case, the court sustained defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, and entered judgment dismissing the action. Plaintiff has appealed. The assignments of error are: In sustaining respondent’s motion for a non-suit and in dismissing the action.

The evidence relative to the activities of appellant and the group with whom she associated on the evening…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Blanchard v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Manser v. EderMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Archer v. BourneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Franco v. VakaresArizona Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Schiller v. RiceTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Borst v. BorstWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Geschwind v. FlanaganWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Upchurch v. HubbardWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local Union No. 55 v. SalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API