Legal Opinion

Wayson v. Rainier Taxi Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1925No. 19218. Department OnePublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The. cause was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendants. Motion for a new trial being made and overruled, judgment was entered upon the verdict. The plaintiff appeals.

The facts which the jury had a right to find may be summarized as follows: The respondent George H. Gould is engaged in operating taxicabs in the city of Tacoma and vicinity and does business under the name of the Rainier Taxi Company. • The respondent Edward J. Scott was the driver of one of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McGeever v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. Winston's Administrator v. City of HendersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Lynn v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bauer v. TougawWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Hemington v. HemingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bogen v. . BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Packard v. QuesnelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Baltimore Co. v. State, Use of KeenanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  5. Traverso v. PupoWashington Supreme Court · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API