Wayson v. Rainier Taxi Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The. cause was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendants. Motion for a new trial being made and overruled, judgment was entered upon the verdict. The plaintiff appeals.
The facts which the jury had a right to find may be summarized as follows: The respondent George H. Gould is engaged in operating taxicabs in the city of Tacoma and vicinity and does business under the name of the Rainier Taxi Company. • The respondent Edward J. Scott was the driver of one of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McGeever v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Winston's Administrator v. City of HendersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Lynn v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Bauer v. TougawWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Hemington v. HemingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bogen v. . BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Packard v. QuesnelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Baltimore Co. v. State, Use of KeenanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Traverso v. PupoWashington Supreme Court · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.