Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1969No. 39516PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Poyhonen, J. †

The question determinative of this appeal may be stated as follows: Where a plaintiff has purchased from his own agent, a mortgage broker, two promissory notes and has simultaneously received from the broker a guaranty that the notes would be paid in accordance with their terms and the plaintiff sues upon the guaranty and not upon the notes, is the defense that the notes are usurious available to the guarantor?

The trial record shows that Stevens-Norton, Inc., prior to receivership, was engaged in the mortgage investment and brokerage business. Larry Stevens and William G. Boyd…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Busk v. HoardWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Sosin v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Fenby v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. HelgesenWashington Supreme Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Fikes v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sherwood & Roberts-Yakima, Inc. v. CohanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. SBN V FNBC LLC v. Vista La., LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. A.A.C. Corp. v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API