Legal Opinion
Fikes v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1975No. 2011, 2020PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CONNOR and BOOCHEVER, JJ. RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
These consolidated appeals involve a controversy regarding the extent of a lending institution’s duty to assure proper disbursement of an interim construction loan secured by a deed of trust on property in which a buyer has a prior equitable interest.
Sometime in early 1970, Neil C. Fikes and his wife Lillian began searching for land upon which to build a house. They located a desirable site, Lot 11, Block 32 of the South Addition to Anchorage, which has become the subject of this suit. When initial talks…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Wayne Building & Loan Co. v. YarboroughOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Curtis v. ConnlySupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Baske v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1965
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stedman v. GEORGETOWN S. & L. ASS'NTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- DeBry v. Valley Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Mims v. Fidelity Funding, Inc. (In Re Auto International Refrigeration)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2002
- Rockhill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Hinsdale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Gary-Wheaton BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.