Legal Opinion

American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Helgesen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1911No. 9537PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Mason county, Mitchell, J., entered January 20, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in consolidated actions upon promissory notes and for the foreclosure of mortgages.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

cThis is an action to recover judgment against Samuel Erickson and wife upon two negotiable promissory notes evidencing their community debt in the total sum of $2,500, and also to foreclose two mortgages given to secure the same upon property in Mason county, one being upon land and the other upon personal property. George B. Helgesen was made a defendant because he has become the owner of the land by virtue' of an execution sale thereof under a judgment rendered in his favor against the defendants Erickson and wife. A trial before the court resulted in a personal judgment against Erickson…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Adams v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  2. Newton v. Emerson, Talcott & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Keene v. BehanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Chivington v. Colorado Springs Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  5. Gribben v. ClementSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pollard v. TobinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. France v. Deep River Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Marine National Exchange Bank v. Kalt-Zimmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. HelgesenWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Barker v. SartoriWashington Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API