Legal Opinion

Sherwood & Roberts-Yakima, Inc. v. Cohan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 18, 1970No. 108-40591-1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.

When Sherwood & Roberts-Yakima, Inc., v. Leach, 67 Wn.2d 630, 409 P.2d 160 (1965), 1 decided that the referral sale scheme conducted by Lifetone Electronics, Inc., to sell Leach a home fire alarm and radio intercommu-nications system was a lottery and illegal, all of the conditional sale contracts purchased by Sherwood & Roberts-Yakima, Inc., and Fairway Finance-Pasco, Inc., 2 from Lifetone 3 became worthless.

Sherwood & Roberts then sued Lifetone and its promoters for breach of their agreements warranting the assigned contracts to be valid and enforceable. Lifetone asserts a defense of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Reed v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Sherwood & Roberts—Yakima, Inc. v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Richards v. KuppingerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Municipal Metallic Bed Manufacturing Corp. v. DobbsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. McDonald v. LundWashington Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Adler v. Fred Lind ManorWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Golberg v. SanglierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. Amtruck Factors v. International Forest ProductsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  4. Brougham v. SwarvaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  5. Roy v. GoerzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API