Legal Opinion
Grossman v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1983No. L.A. 31693PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
The State Bar Court recommends that petitioner, Eugene Grossman, be disciplined for conduct involving the violation of a written retainer agreement with a client. Specifically, the State Bar urges that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for one year, that his suspension be stayed and that petitioner be placed on conditional probation for one year. This court concurs in the State Bar’s recommendation.
I
On October 1, 1981, the State Bar filed a notice to show cause charging petitioner with violating his oath and duties as an attorney at law (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Reynolds v. Sorosis Fruit CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Goldman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Sullivan v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Baldie v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Chester C. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant/appellant v. Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Chester C. Davis, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and Martin Cook, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants/appellees. Summa Corporation, Hughes Aircraft Corporation, Defendants- Counterclaimants/appellants v. Chester C. Davis, Davis & Cox, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and D. Martin Cook, Counterdefendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Cox v. Summa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough v. DawsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996