Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough v. Dawson
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, Justice:
Defendant Jerilyn Shelton Dawson appeals from a judgment for attorney fees entered against her based on findings that plaintiff law firm Jones, Waldo, Holbrook and Mc-Donough did not establish a “cap” on its attorney fees for representing Dawson in her divorce action. She assails the trial court’s decision that collateral estoppel and res judi-cata barred her from relitigating in this action the amount of attorney fees which the divorce court found reasonable in the underlying divorce action. The judgment awarded plaintiff fees for the trial and appeal representation of Dawson…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Joseph Falcone v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Cal Wadsworth Construction v. City of St. GeorgeUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Cheney v. RuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1963
- Davis v. ParrattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Salt Lake County v. Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Strohm v. Clearone Communications, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
- Jordan Construction, Inc. v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Redd v. HillUtah Supreme Court · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.