Legal Opinion
Baldie v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 20, 1950No. Civ. No. 14350PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Two eases involving the same plaintiff but with different defendants were by stipulation consolidated for trial. From judgments adverse to her in both cases plaintiff appeals. The two cases have no facts in common and we must consider them separately.
The Pacheco Case
Plaintiff sued Pacheco to recover certain Chinese rugs and furniture alleged to have been delivered to Pacheco for carpentry work to be done by him and alleging failure of performance by Pacheco. Pacheco answered and cross-complained for the value of services rendered and materials furnished to plaintiff. The court found that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reynolds v. Sorosis Fruit CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Lavenson v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roberts v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Grossman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Baldie v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASS'NCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Roberts v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952