Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1958No. S. F. 19879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT

In three proceedings before local administrative committees of The State Bar (for Alameda County) petitioner was found guilty of nine counts of professional misconduct. The complaints, all similar in nature, in general involve charges that petitioner accepted fees and payments on account of fees for the rendition of future professional services, that he failed to devote the necessary attention to the matters involved and neglected to give satisfactory reports to or make adjustments to the clients, in most instances retaining the sums paid to him. We have concluded that petitioner has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Popp v. Exchange BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. In Re WinneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Webb v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Sullivan v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Resner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hulland v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Rock v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Haley v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API