Goldman v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
The Disciplinary Board of the State Bar has recommended that petitioners, Ronald L. Goldman and Samuel P. Delug, be suspended from the practice of law for one year for conduct involving the solicitation of professional employment. This court concurs in the board’s recommendation.
I
On April 30, 1973, a notice to show cause was served on petitioners, charging each with violating his oath and duties as an attorney (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 6103, 6067, 6068), willfully violating rules 2, 3, and 11 of the Rules of Professional Conduct in effect prior to January 1, 1975 (3B West’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Black v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. C.I.T. Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984
- Baranowski v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Hamilton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Gordon v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.