Legal Opinion

Kiewit/Tulsa-Houston v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 17, 1992No. 430-88CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Senior Judge:

Counts I, II, III, V, VII, VIH and IX of Kiewit/Tulsa-Houston, A Joint Venture’s complaint are before the court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.1 The issue for decision is whether plaintiff properly certified its complaint pursuant to section 605(c)(1) of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. Plaintiff opposes defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. After consideration of the parties submissions and after oral argument held December 20, 1991, the court grants defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.

*112FACTS

Kiewit Industrial Co., a Nebraska corporation, and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Fortec Constructors v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Skelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. The United States v. Grumman Aerospace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. And Ball & Brosamer (Jv) v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Orange Cove Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Kiewit/tulsa-Houston v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. Omni Moving & Storage of Virginia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. and The Boeing CompanyArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API