Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. And Ball & Brosamer (Jv) v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Interior Board of Contract Appeals (Board) dismissing appeals in two consolidated cases from decisions of the contracting officer denying the contractor’s claims for additional compensation. The ground of dismissal was that the claims were not properly certified under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (Act), 41 U.S.C. § 605(c)(1) (1982), because the certifications of the claims were not signed by a person authorized to certify claims under the Act. Appeal of Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc., 88-3 BCA (CCH) ¶ 20,844 (1988). We affirm.
I
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha WangSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Skelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- W. H. Moseley Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Donald M. Drake Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Case, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- The United States v. Grumman Aerospace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- The United States v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.