County of Los Angeles v. Continental Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the above entitled actions which were tried before the court without a jury, the three actions having been consolidated for the purpose of trial, defendants appeal.
The Honorable Julius V-. Patrosso, the trial judge, prepared and filed an exhaustive and splendid opinion which fully sets forth the facts, appellant’s contentions and the law applicable thereto. Since we have reached the same conclusions as the learned trial judge, no useful purpose would be served by our rephrasing the opinion prepared by Judge Patrosso. Therefore we…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Graciosa Oil Co. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Great Western Furniture Co. v. Porter Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Flaherty v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Atlantic Oil Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.