Legal Opinion
Sounhein v. City of San Dimas
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 29, 1996No. B087330PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION
Appellants Earl and Alana Sounhein appeal from the denial of their petition for a supplemental writ of mandate in connection with their application for a conditional use permit to build a second residential unit on their property located in the City of San Dimas. This court previously affirmed a judgment ordering the City of San Dimas to process the Sounheins' application under the standards set forth in Government Code1 section 65852.2, subdivision (b).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- County of Imperial v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Wilson v. City of Laguna BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Anza Parking Corp. v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Maintain Our Desert Environment v. Town of Apple ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Stephens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Anderson v. Provo City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
- TrafficSchoolOnline, Inc. v. ClarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Park At Cross Creek, LLC v. City of Mali, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.